BLACK mobile logo

united states

Head Start can still use words like ‘race’ and ‘women’ for federal funding, judge says

January 9, 2026

A federal judge has issued a temporary injunction blocking the Trump administration's attempts to restrict diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in Head Start early childhood programs and prevent mass layoffs. The administration had threatened to withhold funding from Head Start providers using terms like "women," "race," "bias," and "equitable" in their grant applications, forcing some directors to remove essential program components such as autism training for educators. Head Start programs in multiple states, along with advocacy groups including the ACLU, filed lawsuits arguing these restrictions contradict federal requirements under the Head Start Act and undermine the program's 60-year mission of serving economically disadvantaged families.

Who is affected

  • Head Start programs in Pennsylvania, Washington, Wisconsin, and Illinois (named plaintiffs)
  • Head Start providers across 17 states and Puerto Rico
  • Economically disadvantaged families, disproportionately Black and Latinx communities
  • Children with disabilities, particularly those with autism
  • Parents in rural areas who rely on Head Start for childcare
  • Head Start program directors and educators
  • Two advocacy groups (including the ACLU Women's Rights Project)

What action is being taken

  • A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's DEI restrictions through a temporary injunction
  • The judge has prevented mass layoffs within Head Start programs
  • The Trump administration is attempting to withhold funding from programs using certain language in grant applications
  • HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is cracking down on DEI measures while conditionally preserving Head Start funding

Why it matters

  • Head Start has served economically disadvantaged families for over 60 years, and restricting DEI language and initiatives undermines the program's legal mandate and core mission. The restrictions prevent directors from adequately serving their communities, particularly people with disabilities, creating situations where providers cannot fulfill federal requirements under the Head Start Act. Early childhood education provided by Head Start has been proven critical for school readiness and lifelong success, and eliminating these services would immediately cut off educational opportunities for vulnerable children while removing essential childcare support for parents, especially in rural areas. The administration's actions threaten to erase entire communities from receiving services and could devastate the economics of communities that depend on these programs.

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: The 19th